查看单个帖子
旧 2010-04-28, 22:21     #5
xxyyzz97 xxyyzz97 当前离线
正式会员
等级: 三袋长老
级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时
 
Uid: 44994
注册日期: 2007-06-03, 02:25
帖子: 178
感谢: 4
63 个帖子获得 99 次感谢
现金: 1金币
资产: 1金币
声望: 10 xxyyzz97 向着好的方向发展
xxyyzz97 xxyyzz97 当前离线
正式会员
等级: 三袋长老
级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:23 | 在线时长:668小时 | 升级还需:4小时
 
Uid: 44994
注册日期: 2007-06-03, 02:25
帖子: 178
感谢: 4
63 个帖子获得 99 次感谢
现金: 1金币
资产: 1金币
声望: 10 xxyyzz97 向着好的方向发展
默认

Yes, each press having its own characteristic, so an individual ICC for each press is the most perfect.
Regarding the reality to have separate ICC for each press, whether this is workable. It is depends, what is the quality is seeking for, how many presses involved, the nature of job, production control, etc. Many factors would be affecting this.
In the past, no one can imagine that the sheetfed press min. print run would be drop to a few hundred. In some research, if jobs is enough, the min. print run for a press can be as low as around 300 prints.
There is no a single way to do that, the process flow arrangement would be vary.
xxyyzz97 当前离线