| 论坛帮助 |
| 日历事件 |
|
|
只看该作者 #5 | ||
|
|||
|
正式会员
等级: 三袋长老
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Regarding the reality to have separate ICC for each press, whether this is workable. It is depends, what is the quality is seeking for, how many presses involved, the nature of job, production control, etc. Many factors would be affecting this. In the past, no one can imagine that the sheetfed press min. print run would be drop to a few hundred. In some research, if jobs is enough, the min. print run for a press can be as low as around 300 prints. There is no a single way to do that, the process flow arrangement would be vary. |
||
|
|
|
|
只看该作者 #6 | |||
|
||||
|
荣誉版主
等级: 七袋长老
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
引用:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
只看该作者 #7 | ||
|
|||
|
正式会员
等级: 三袋长老
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The link is not direct or very weak. Why a printer can lower the min. print quantity to a few hundred? Cost. How many jobs for a press (let said 8-up) can be done in one shift (8 hours)? Imagine a press can done 40 jobs in one shift and the other one can only print 24 (same total print volume and same quality), and the waste (paper, ink, etc) of the 50 jobs is close to that 24 jobs. Which one's cost is lower? If the one printing 50 jobs charge at the same price of each job. Whose profit would be higher? In this case, what we need? speed & accuracy. From here you will find the link. |
||
|
|
|
|
只看该作者 #8 | |||
|
||||
|
正式会员
等级: 五袋长老
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
理论上每台印刷机一个ICC Profile, 那么?5色机五座之间是否一致? 每座有每座的印刷特性曲线,而不是CMYK不同色版有其自身的印刷特性曲线。 我不是要把事情说复杂,说的不能解决。 我的观点是:软件与硬件要相互配合。 在硬件层面: 同一台印刷机尽量把能够调一致的座按同一标准调一致。 (*自己定义此系统所谓一致的公差范围) 同一印厂,尽量把能够调一致的机台按同一标准调一致。 确实要分开的可以分组,如轮转机、平张机按网点扩大率分2组。 系统规划、硬件调整、何以简化系统、提高效率。 |
|||
|
|
|
|
只看该作者 #11 | |||
|
||||
|
正式会员
等级: 六袋长老
![]() ![]()
|
但是,如果印刷标准化的能顺利推行的话,各类机器的状态维护在一个相当的水平上的话,就不需要为每一台设备都制作各自的ICC了。 对于CTP补偿曲线也是同样的道理。 |
|||
|
|