[RealX11]

According to a PrePress source,
there are also many bugs in "PACK 5.2.0, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.4, 5.2.5" versions.

[RealX11]

Artpro + lacks much, needs to be improved. But it is stable and faster.

PACKZ much more advanced programs.
But there are a lot of bugs.

Packz is advantageous now. In order to maintain this, users should pay attention to their feedback.
If he doesn't pay attention to this issue, he will be replaced by "ArtPro +" in the future.

[RealX11]

There are 2 important advantages to signing a maintenance contract.

1- All year round updates are free.
2- They have to give support for everything you want to do in the program but cannot do. If necessary, they have to explain by video.

Sample;
You have purchased the program and have not made any maintenance agreements.
It has been 3 years since your program is no longer up to date.

If you want to update the program after 3 years, the price you will pay is about 15,000 €

But if you made a 3-year maintenance agreement, the price you would pay is about 3,500 €
You have the right to ask every question you want in the maintenance agreement.

In summary;
It is advantageous for the user to make maintenance agreements.

[RealX11]

The software is not bad.

The interface is bad.
Too much bug is bad.
customer support is bad.

[RealX11]

I tested it with your file.
PACKZ 5.2.5 used 8 cores cpu. Trapping is done in 19 minutes.
ArtPro + 18.1.2 used 1 core cpu. Trapping is done in 3 minutes.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

Please tell me the time and file size of saving the file after the trapping of packz 5.2.5.

It's been 50 minutes since I said save the file.
I did not want to wait any longer, I closed it with "Force quit".

I will not be able to provide information with file size and duration. :)

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

这一点也不意外,储存该文件需要耗费120分钟以上,档案超过950MB,文件开启是正常的且陷印过的.很明显浪费过多的时间很不正常.希望PACKZ公司可以改进.

I have reported this time difference between PACKZ and ArtPro + as "HYBRID Software R&D".

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

我在这里弱弱的问问---Hybrid software公司的cloudflow有哪些单位在使用?知道的弟兄能吱个声吗？ 感谢帮忙!

Chinese -> English translation is not exactly correct.
By unit, you meant a Module ?

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

Do you have the cloudyflow installer? or packzflow module ?

You can see it in the attached photo.

There is no single installer file.
Installation takes 3 days.

Files are specific.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

Can you show me the cloudflow folder contents, may be packzflow is a dll file?

We don't have packzflow.
I wanted to show the modules used.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

The Packzflow is a module of cloudflow, do you know ?

Yes I know. Now it is.
It was not like this before.

Because the support department says there is a server installation for 2 days.

BTW: Esko said it would make a cloud Automation Engine.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

How huge is the cloudflow process, and the installation actually takes so long from two to three days? Does the installer require 50GB or 50T? Does it take three days to install?

It is not just installation that takes 2-3 days. Configuration and adjustments.
This is the standard procedures.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

Those are cloudflow installation training courses, for me those courses are redundant

1st row installation and 2 days.
2nd row training. 5 days.

So it is called 2 days for installation.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

A few days of installation is not the point, the point is whether you have a cloudflow installer?

I wrote for informational purposes to help you.

I don't have the installation file.
But if you buy cloudflow, there is an installation file for it.
This installation, which actually takes 3-4 hours, is given about 2 days with all the adjustments.

Hybrid software that says that.
And for informational purposes only.

[RealX11]

作者: 重庆&老鬼

You can download it from ruboard.

"ruboard"= "forum.ru-board.com" here?