[Topstep1]

作者: 苍狼白鹿

这软件和basiccolor一定有某种关系，因为内容方面基本相同，包括某些界面。
并且，加密方式都一样。

ColorLogic MAKES the software engine. and BasICColor LICENSES it FROM ColorLogic.

example:
BasICColor Imporve = ColorLogic Ant
BasICColor Ghost = ColorLogic Zepra

Some Rips license the ColorLogic Color Engine, like Colorgate and FlexiSign

[Topstep1]

作者: 夜色无黑

苍老师，Color Ant 期待您也给破了！！

Colorant is separate installer, so need separate patch.dll

[Topstep1]

作者: tiandiyiqi

說實話設備連結功能沒有實際生產使用過，
但是按照其原理是為了保持實地的“實”，
因此就一定會犧牲顏色的準確性。

顏色看起來實，但是顏色可以差一點或者更多，
這個不知道國內的客戶多少可以接受。

專色功能不錯，可以直接將專色轉成四色或多色。
目前我接觸的只有ESKO的可以。

This has always been my concern with Ink Saving technology. It can sacrifice color accuracy.

But it does not HAVE to. If a color has a LAB value; it can be 'recaluated' with DIFFERENT CMYK values but, STILL have the same LAB value. Then the colors would still match.

[Topstep1]

作者: 苍狼白鹿

[隐藏内容]

Any chance ZePrA will follow? ZePrA is the ColorServer.

[Topstep1]

作者: 宝器

大千世界，无奇不有，ColorLogic和basICColor长得几乎一模一样，难道它们是史密斯夫妇写出来的？两口子较劲呢！又或者是东邪西毒，巅峰对决，常人难以望其项背？

ColorLogic 'leads' and BasICColor 'follows'

[Topstep1]

What about Zepra and ColorAnt?


Topstep1